An Ecosystem of Carbon Dioxide Removal Reviews – Part 3: Enhanced Weathering
DOI:
Loading...
Christiana Dietzen,
Tyler Kukla,
Jake T Thompson,
Maya Almaraz,
Matteo B Bertagni,
Liam Adam Bullock,
Isadora Falkson,
Patrick Frings,
Rachel Gregg,
Nicholas Iff,
Jonathan Lambert,
Yating Li,
Brian Rogers,
Jonas Marc Schneider,
Elizabeth Herman Swanson,
Feng Tao,
Samuel Shou-En Tsao,
Robrecht Van Der Bauwhede,
Shuang Zhang,
Shashank Kumar Anand,
James Campbell,
Isabelle Davis,
Millie Dobson,
Xavier Dupla,
Spyros Foteinis,
Minger Guo,
Kirsty Harrington,
Chloe Kent,
Alexandra Klemme,
Jennifer Kroeger,
Tobias Linke,
Stella Linnekogel,
Spencer Moller,
Ella Milliken,
Likhwa Ndlovu,
Shrey Patel,
Evelin Pihlap,
Kate Rees,
Robert Rioux,
Malgorzata Rizzi,
Sam Shaheen,
Laura Steinwidder,
Isabella Steeley,
Tim Sweere,
Fengchao Sun,
Xiying Sun,
Wyatt Tatge,
Lolyn Tejedal Lemus,
James Westphalen,
Chad M. Baum,
Susan Brantley,
Salvatore Calabrese,
Tyler Cyronak,
Tabea Dorndorf,
Claire Fyson,
Jens Hartmann,
Iris Holzer,
Benjamin Houlton,
Kelsey Jensen,
Yoshiki Kanzaki,
Anu Khan,
Charlotte Levy,
Sarah Lueck,
David Manning,
Joseph R.H. Manning,
Johannes Meyer zu Drewer,
Christopher Pearce,
Philip Pogge von Strandmann,
Peter A. Raymond,
Phil Renforth,
Tim Repke,
James E. Saiers,
Rafael Santos,
Jonathan Smolen,
Li Tan,
Sara Vicca,
Romany Webb,
Yuan Yao,
Bingquan Zhang,
Noah Planavsky,
Sabine Fuss
Abstract
Enhanced Weathering (EW) is an emerging Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) approach within a growing portfolio of mitigation strategies, offering the potential for durable CDR alongside agronomic co-benefits. As interest in CDR increases, EW is transitioning from a primarily scientific concept toward early-stage implementation, requiring a comprehensive synthesis of the current evidence base. This systematic review focuses primarily on soil-based EW using silicate rock feedstocks. Across empirical and modelling studies, area-normalized CDR fluxes have a median value of 0.84 tonnes of carbon dioxide per hectare per year (tCO2 ha⁻1 yr⁻1) and span several orders of magnitude. The variance in reported fluxes reflects not only context-dependent differences in EW performance, but also the diversity of quantification approaches, which differ by use case and vary in terms of their system boundaries and treatment of loss processes. When scaled globally, evidence from empirical constraints and/or modelling approaches converges on a maximum technical CDR potential of ~0.2–2 GtCO2 yr⁻¹, though some estimates are higher. Significant uncertainty remains regarding the magnitude, persistence, and timing of loss processes after initial CDR has occurred, including secondary phase formation and cation exchange, and in how these losses depend on local soil and climate conditions and deployment strategies. Interactions with soil organic carbon introduce additional uncertainty but also the potential for increasing total CDR. Beyond CDR, EW is consistently associated with improvements in soil properties and crop productivity. Its deployment within managed land systems creates opportunities for synergies with other land-based CDR approaches, enabling combined inorganic and biological carbon sequestration. At the same time, EW raises important socio-economic and governance considerations, including distributional impacts, environmental risks, and conditional public support. Overall, EW represents a context-dependent and multifunctional CDR pathway, with increasing evidence for its potential to contribute to both climate mitigation and multiple Sustainable Development Goals. Its effective and scalable deployment will depend on improved standardisation, robust monitoring and verification, and alignment with economic, environmental, and societal constraints.
Accounting >>Environmental impacts >>Geochemical CDR >>Policy and regulation >>Qualitative research >>Removal process >>Socioeconomic impacts >>Storage process >>Supporting infrastructure >>
None
JEL maintains un-exercised options in the carbon registry Isometric awarded during his employment there from 2023-2024. MD currently works for UNDO Carbon, but at the time of contribution to this systematic review held no conflicts of interest. RBN has served as a paid reviewer of project applications submitted to Frontier Climate for ERW funding, and as a paid technical consultant for Cascade Climate, Mati Carbon, and Crew Carbon. RBN also collaborates on an EW research project with UNDO Carbon, which has provided a research gift to support this work. PAR, CTR, and NJP serve as scientific advisors to CREW Carbon, a company that generates alkalinity in wastewater treatment plants using lime addition but does not work on terrestrial Enhanced Weathering in agricultural fields. MEV offers consulting services related to the general subject area of this research, but these consulting activities are not directly connected to the work presented in this manuscript. NJP and CTR were co-founders of the EW supplier Lithos Carbon but have no financial ties to the company. All other authors declare no competing interests.
July 16, 2026